Monday, December 5, 2011

On Helene Cixous


I love rebels and Helene Cixous is definitely one. Her writing has really provoked me to think about the media portray women and the messages it is sending to our teenagers and young adults. I was a rebel growing up. I was a tomboy who liked playing street football with the boys, beating up anyone who deserved it (usually they were messing with my little brother or using racial remarks), could not get me in a dress to save your life, and did not discover makeup until well into junior high school. Slowly but surely I came around and was able to merge wearing dresses and putting on makeup with my active sports life and tomboyish ways that peaked out every now and then. What I did not like was the media telling me at every turn that something was wrong with me because I was not concerned with trying to be paper thin with long straight hair, blue eyes, and a fair complexion. What affected me the most and made me start doubting myself is when the boys I was falling in love with were not falling in love back. Doubt started creeping in and I started to think there was something to all the media hype.
Outside of family and friends impressionable youth are looking at magazine ads, television, video games, and the internet to shape their views regarding female body image and female roles in business and society. These messages can really do damage. To minimize the damage and ensure a positive outcome it is imperative that women start wielding the mighty pen to write with feminine language and imagery, to have a voice, to take back the control over our bodies and our lives. We should shape our own messages and views not let it happen to us.

My Thoughts on Raka Shome's "Postcolonial Interventions in the Rhetorical Canon: An "Other" View"


Call me crazy but I find it extremely ironic that rhetorical studies is being challenged by a bunch of white men in power regarding white men in power from the past and present! I just read pages of these rhetoricians ideas of how not to essentialize, or at least to do so strategically, to resist hegemony or “to conduct an ‘ascending analysis of power’ Foucault, 1980, p. 99)” of the writer’s own discourse (Shome 597).
It is suggested that these rhetoricians can try to unlearn the rhetorical tradition as Spivak suggests but most people do not just forget what they know. Also soul searching to figure out why the discipline is so white is recommended but this would only work for those who recognize there truly is a problem and then still they would have to try and understand or interpret how their actions played a major part in the problem. They would need to recognize the fact that they could empathize but never sympathize with those who are marginalized.
The rhetorical field needs to study all discourses not just the west and make a conscious effort to investigate and learn about other races and cultures. Only then will rhetoricians be able to attempt soul searching with eyes wide open and accept other views outside of the rhetorical tradition.